Health and Cost Effectiveness Modelling Pancreas Type A-D

The Model1

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-1.png


  1. SmartPAN Cost Effectiveness Model for Pancreatic Surgery. DOC-03489, data on file.
  2. Nahm C.B et al., Intra-Operative Amylase Concentration in Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Predicts Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.
    J Gastrointest Surg, 2017. 21(6): p. 1031-1037.
  3. Mungroop T.H et al., Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and International External Validation.
    Ann Surg, 2019. 269(5): p. 937-943.
  4. Schuh F et al., A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of
    the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e597-e608.
  5. McMillan M.T., et al., Risk-adjusted Outcomes of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Model for
    Performance Evaluation. Ann Surg, 2016. 264(2): p. 344-52.
  6. Wang W et al., Has the pancreatic fistula already occurred in the operation? An intraoperative predictive factor of clinical relevantpostoperative
    pancreatic fistula after the distal pancreatectomy. Surg Open Sci, 2019. 1(1): p. 38-42.
  7. Pulvirenti A et al., Clinical Implications of the 2016 International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery Definition and Grading of
    Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula on 775 Consecutive Pancreatic Resections. Ann Surg, 2018. 268(6): p. 1069-1075.